Circumstantial Evidence Within The Casey Anthony Trial Research Paper

Circumstantial Evidence Within The Casey Anthony Trial - Research Paper Exampledid not deservingness proving the case of intended murder of Caylee beyond sane doubt, it is evident that the prosecutors had adduced yard that had sufficiently served the principle of reasonable doubt as a requirement of the virtue (Sarokin, 2011).Circumstantial Evidence is the important piece of evidence in criminal cases prosecution, owing to the fact that only a small percentage of villainys would be punish out of existing direct evidence. If all cases were to depend on direct evidence where a spectator was present when the accused committed a crime, only a meager criminal file cases would purge pass for trial (Fanning, 2009). After all, what would hinder the defendant denying being involved even when the witness passive witnessed the crime being committed? In this respect, Circumstantial Evidence is vital for criminal trial, since it provides for the relevant pass through which reasoning can be applied, so at to reach to a conclusion regarding how the crime was committed. The Casey Anthony Trial appears to have deduced sufficient circumstantial evidence, only that it was not executed properly.First, false testimony that Casey gave to the law enforcement officers when they set on investigating the case is sufficient to indicate that the defendant was determined to obstruct the origin of justice (Ashton & Pulitzer, 2012). Despite the fact that reasonable doubt as a basis of determining the blameful or not guilty verdict for the accused is a necessity, nothing could be more indicative of the fact that the defendant must have known something about the death of Caylee than the false statements. Therefore, Casey was lying so that she could obstruct the law enforcement officers from being able to conduct a fruitful investigation. Casey had lied to her mother that Caylee was every with a nanny, in the beach, in the house and a host of other places for the whole time that her nan was asking for whereabouts (Russell & Cohn, 2013). Additionally, Casey lied